Multiple municipalities across Dallas-Fort Worth have voted to oppose a request from Oncor that could increase an average residential electric bill by about $7.90 per month.

Oncor, the largest energy delivery company in Texas, filed a rate review in June with the Public Utility Commission of Texas, requesting a rate hike due to several factors like explosive growth across the state, record levels of construction, and the impact of extreme weather.

The proposed rate is 12.3% for residential and 51% for street lighting, according to documents presented at city meetings. The higher rates would increase Oncor’s revenue $834 million, a roughly 13% uptick.

State law allows that every four years an electric utility, like Oncor, can file a comprehensive rate case with the PUCT to increase customer rates and recover capital costs, like costs to build transmission lines or other infrastructure improvements.It’s typical for the Oncor Cities Steering Committee, a coalition of more than 170cities in the utility’s service area, jointly intervene in these types of PUCT proceedings. Part of that process includes member cities passing a resolution denying the rate increase.

In light of the proposed rate increase, the Texas Advanced Energy Business Alliance (TAEBA) commissioned a study. The organization found that Oncor customers could save $8.5 billion over the next 10 years, if the utility integrated more distributed energy resources into its system planning and operations, the group announced last week.

The study concluded that including customer-owned technologies such as household solar and battery storage, electric vehicles and smart appliances in the utility’s grid planning and ERCOT’s market operations could save every Oncor customer roughly $279 per year while avoiding “unnecessary” grid expansion.

Matt Boms, TAEBA executive director, said instead of Oncor requesting an increased rate, it should be paying attention to solutions that could cut bills.

“For Oncor, the message is open in the playbook,” Boms said. “Share your grid maps, show us where local energy can connect efficiently to the grid and where it’s needed the most. Let local energy compete with traditional spending on poles and wires, where it might be cheaper or faster to integrate distributed resources and then streamline the approvals.”

Boms said distributed energy resources are proven technologies that give Texans more independence and resilience, especially during extreme weather.

“[Distributed energy resources] have all been around for several years now, and there’s really not a good reason for utilities to be dragging their feet when it comes to interconnecting these technologies,” Boms said. Adding: “We could strengthen the grid and make it more reliable, but only if we let innovation work. My message would be, it’s time to stop building those barriers and build a little bit smarter. We didn’t have these solutions 15, 20 years ago, but they’re certainly making a difference now.”

In an emailed statement, Oncor officials said it does work with customers interested in leveraging the technologies.

Read the full article here.